Please note:

This site is about to be archived.

See www.lse.ac.uk/law/events for forthcoming events.


Stay tuned …
  • Criminal proof: Fixed or flexible?

    Vera Anstey Room (VAR) First floor, Old Building, Houghton Street, LSE, United Kingdom
    Seminars 

    Speaker: Dr Lewis Ross (LSE)


    The aim of the Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Theory Forum is to provide a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue on the criminal law and the criminal justice system. Its members and affiliates (mainly from LSE Law School but also other LSE Departments and institutions) conduct research on various aspects of criminal law and criminal justice from a variety of methodological standpoints (moral, political and social theory, criminology, anthropology, epistemology etc.).

  • Fight, flight, freeze … or lie? Rethinking the principles of res gestae evidence in light of its revival

    Vera Anstey Room (VAR) First floor, Old Building, Houghton Street, LSE, United Kingdom
    Seminars 

    The aim of the Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Theory Forum is to provide a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue on the criminal law and the criminal justice system. Its members and affiliates (mainly from LSE Law School but also other LSE Departments and institutions) conduct research on various aspects of criminal law and criminal justice from a variety of methodological standpoints (moral, political and social theory, criminology, anthropology, epistemology etc.).

  • Doing justice to expectations of being heard

    Vera Anstey Room (VAR) First floor, Old Building, Houghton Street, LSE, United Kingdom
    Seminars 
    Speaker: Professor Sarah Summers (Zurich)

    The aim of the Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Theory Forum is to provide a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue on the criminal law and the criminal justice system. Its members and affiliates (mainly from LSE Law School but also other LSE Departments and institutions) conduct research on various aspects of criminal law and criminal justice from a variety of methodological standpoints (moral, political and social theory, criminology, anthropology, epistemology etc.).

  • Workshop: Intermediate verdicts in criminal justice and beyond

    Vera Anstey Room (VAR) First floor, Old Building, Houghton Street, LSE, United Kingdom
    Seminars 

    The binary verdict system, that is, a decision-making arrangement comprising a single standard of proof and two possible verdicts, is often taken for granted by those operating in jurisdictions that feature this system. England and Wales are such a jurisdiction. There appears to be a widespread view that the reasons for endorsing the binary system are self-evident, such that there is no need for articulating them. The study of intermediate verdicts (the Scottish ‘not proven’, in primis), and of the debates surrounding them, is a healthy reminder that alternatives to the binary system do exist and that, therefore, a justification for such a system should be given, instead of being merely assumed. By addressing the question whether intermediate verdicts can be justified, with this workshop we aim to overcome the current dogmatism concerning the binary verdict system, that is, we aim to encourage an open discussion about the reasons in favour or against binary verdicts.